<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kb.hurricane-ridge.com &#187; iscsi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/tag/iscsi/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com</link>
	<description>My personal - but public - knowledge base</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Setting SCSI Timeout Values for FreeBSD VMs on VMware/NetApp</title>
		<link>http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/os/freebsd/setting-scsi-timeout-values-for-freebsd-vms-on-vmwarenetapp</link>
		<comments>http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/os/freebsd/setting-scsi-timeout-values-for-freebsd-vms-on-vmwarenetapp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fibre channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sysctl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timeout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/?p=969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NetApp requires setting a timeout value of 190 seconds for all VMware data stores on their filers to handle &#8220;long fabric or storage-side I/O interruptions&#8221;; this is done as follows on FreeBSD: This can be set permanently in /etc/sysctl.conf: Elsewhere, I have seen a recommendation for FreeBSD on ESX that kern.cam.da.retry_count be set to 120.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NetApp <a href="https://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb41511">requires</a> setting a timeout value of 190 seconds for all VMware data stores on their filers to handle &#8220;long fabric or storage-side I/O interruptions&#8221;; this is done as follows on FreeBSD:</p>
<pre class="brush: bash; light: true; title: ; notranslate">
# sysctl kern.cam.da.default_timeout=190
</pre>
<p>This can be set permanently in /etc/sysctl.conf:</p>
<pre class="brush: bash; light: true; title: ; notranslate">
kern.cam.da.default_timeout=190
</pre>
<p>Elsewhere, I have seen a <a href="https://www.dan.me.uk/blog/2009/05/24/freebsd-with-esx/">recommendation</a> for FreeBSD on ESX that kern.cam.da.retry_count be set to 120.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/os/freebsd/setting-scsi-timeout-values-for-freebsd-vms-on-vmwarenetapp/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bookmarks for September 21, 2009</title>
		<link>http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/links/bookmarks-for-september-21-2009</link>
		<comments>http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/links/bookmarks-for-september-21-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vsphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/?p=640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Links for September 21, 2009: Virtual Geek: A Multivendor Post on using iSCSI with VMware vSphere &#8211; &#34;One of the most popular posts we&#8217;ve ever done was the original &#8220;A &#8216;Multivendor Post&#8217; to help our mutual iSCSI customers using VMware&#8221; that focused on the operation of the software iSCSI initiator in ESX 3.5 with several [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links for September 21, 2009:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://virtualgeek.typepad.com/virtual_geek/2009/09/a-multivendor-post-on-using-iscsi-with-vmware-vsphere.html">Virtual Geek: A Multivendor Post on using iSCSI with VMware vSphere</a> &#8211; &quot;One of the most popular posts we&rsquo;ve ever done was the original &ldquo;A &lsquo;Multivendor Post&rsquo; to help our mutual iSCSI customers using VMware&rdquo; that focused on the operation of the software iSCSI initiator in ESX 3.5 with several iSCSI targets from multiple vendors. There&rsquo;s been a lot of demand for a follow-up, so without further ado, here&rsquo;s a multivendor collaborative effort on an update, which leverages extensively content from VMworld 2009 sessions TA2467 and TA3264.&quot;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/links/bookmarks-for-september-21-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bookmarks for June 29, 2009</title>
		<link>http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/links/bookmarks-for-june-29-2009</link>
		<comments>http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/links/bookmarks-for-june-29-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fibre channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmfs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Links for June 29, 2009: VMware Communities: Change iscsi lun to fcp &#8211; VMware communities post on moving NetApp iSCSI VMFS LUN to FCP.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links for June 29, 2009:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://communities.vmware.com/thread/106442#766675">VMware Communities: Change iscsi lun to fcp</a> &#8211; VMware communities post on moving NetApp iSCSI VMFS LUN to FCP.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kb.hurricane-ridge.com/links/bookmarks-for-june-29-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

